Why do some unexpected events catch us completely off guard while others don’t? New research from Stanford suggests the answer has less to do with the quality of information available and more to do with the mental framework we use to interpret it.
Key Takeaways:
- The Missing Piece: While most research on strategic surprise focuses on information failures, Stanford psychologists found that how people structure their expectations matters just as much as what information they have.
- Abstract vs. Concrete Thinking: Both modes of thinking have blind spots. Overly abstract thinkers miss local signals; overly concrete thinkers miss broad patterns. The real skill lies in toggling between the two.
- Simple Exercises That Help: Asking “why” encourages abstract thinking while asking “how” encourages concrete thinking, and alternating between near and distant future scenarios can meaningfully expand our ability to anticipate what comes next.
- Everyday Relevance: Strategic thinking is not reserved for boardrooms or war games. Every social situation at work, at home, or on the road is an opportunity to practice it.
Greater Good explores the science of a meaningful life.
